Linking two administrative datasets about looked after children: testing feasibility and enhancing understanding

Main Article Content

Jade Hooper
Linda Cusworth
Helen Whincup

Abstract

Background with rationale
Every year all 32 local authorities in Scotland provide information on looked after children in their area to the Scottish Government. This forms the basis for the annual Children Looked After Statistics (CLAS). Information is also collected by Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration (SCRA) on all children who are involved in the Children’s Hearings System. Until now these two data sets had never been linked.


Main Aim
To test the feasibility and success of the linkage on the basis that these datasets had not previously been linked, and if linkage was possible, use this data to enhance our understanding of the child and process factors associated with pathways to permanence or lack of permanence.


Methods/Approach
Veterans were identified using the South London and Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre (SLaM) case register – a database holding secondary mental health care electronic records for the South London and Maudsley National Health Service Trust of 300,000 patients. We developed two methods. An NLP and machine learning tool were developed to automatically evaluate personal history statements written by clinicians.


Results
For the first time, as part of the Permanently Progressing? Building secure futures for children in Scotland study, these two data sets were linked safely and successfully for 1,000 children who became looked after in 2012-13 when they were aged five and under.


The linkage provided important new information for practitioners and policymakers. In this presentation we will focus on the key findings, such as what it told us about previous referrals and methodological insights regarding these data sets and their linkage.


Conclusion
The data linkage process was complex and time-consuming but possible. The data we were able to link provided valuable information that enhanced our understanding of child and process factors.

Background with rationale

Every year all 32 local authorities in Scotland provide information on looked after children in their area to the Scottish Government. This forms the basis for the annual Children Looked After Statistics (CLAS). Information is also collected by Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration (SCRA) on all children who are involved in the Children’s Hearings System. Until now these two data sets had never been linked.

Main aim

To test the feasibility and success of the linkage on the basis that these datasets had not previously been linked, and if linkage was possible, use this data to enhance our understanding of the child and process factors associated with pathways to permanence or lack of permanence.

Methods/Approach

The CLAS and SCRA data were linked by a trusted third party (National Records Scotland) using a child’s date of birth, gender and the local authority at the time they became looked after within a predefined period of time (2012-13). The data were analysed within the National Safe Haven in Edinburgh.

Results

For the first time, as part of the Permanently Progressing? Building secure futures for children in Scotland study, these two data sets were linked safely and successfully for 1,000 children who became looked after in 2012-13 when they were aged five and under.

The linkage provided important new information for practitioners and policymakers. In this presentation we will focus on the key findings, such as what it told us about previous referrals and methodological insights regarding these data sets and their linkage.

Conclusion

The data linkage process was complex and time-consuming but possible. The data we were able to link provided valuable information that enhanced our understanding of child and process factors.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hooper, J., Cusworth, L. and Whincup, H. (2019) “Linking two administrative datasets about looked after children: testing feasibility and enhancing understanding”, International Journal of Population Data Science, 4(3). doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v4i3.1242.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>