<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"[]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3674</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11:5:3674</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pii">S2399490821036740</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Population Data Science</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Accuracy of EMR-based algorithms for Adverse Event Detection</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Southern</surname><given-names initials="D">Danielle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cheligeer</surname><given-names initials="C">Cheligeer</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names initials="G">Guosong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Eastwood</surname><given-names initials="C">Cathy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names initials="Y">Yong</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Boussat</surname><given-names initials="B">Bastien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Flemons</surname><given-names initials="W">Ward</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-6"><sup>6</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Forster</surname><given-names initials="A">Alan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-7"><sup>7</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names initials="Y">Yuan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-8"><sup>8</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Quan</surname><given-names initials="H">Hude</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-9"><sup>9</sup></xref></contrib>
<aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-2"><label>2</label><institution>Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Healthcare Analytics, Cape Breton University, Sydney, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-4"><label>4</label><institution>Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-5"><label>5</label><institution>Clinical Epidemiology and Quality of Care Unit, University Grenoble Alpes, Faculty of Medicine, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-9"><label>9</label><institution>Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Centre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</institution></aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day></day><month></month><year></year></pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic"><year></year></pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<elocation-id>3674</elocation-id>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/3674">This article is available from the IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/3674</self-uri>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>Adverse events (AEs) are often measured using administrative data, which has validity limitations. Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) provide rich, unstructured data that can improve AE detection through data science methods. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of EMR-based algorithms for AE detection and estimate AE prevalence.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We conducted a retrospective chart review validation study at a tertiary-care hospital (population ∼1.5M). Adult patients admitted between 2017–2022 with discharge summaries or narrative EMRs were included; only the most recent admission was analyzed. Seventeen algorithms were developed for specific AE categories and an overall “any AE” category using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and model performance (AUC, accuracy, F1 score) were calculated using chart review as a reference.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Of 10,939 charts, 10,659 were linked to discharge data; 2,069 patients had ≥1 AE. AE prevalence ranged from 0.2%–6.0%. Sensitivity and specificity varied (57%–100%, 74%–96%). For “any AE,” sensitivity was 63%, specificity 94%, PPV 72%, NPV 91%. Overall algorithm performance: AUC 78.4% (95% CI, 76.0–80.8), accuracy 87.6%, F1 score 67.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>NLP-based algorithms applied to EMRs show strong performance despite low AE prevalence, offering a scalable approach to enhance AE surveillance and patient safety.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>