<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"[]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v11i5.3588</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11:5:3588</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pii">S2399490821035886</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Population Data Science</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Can and should we? Use of maternal administrative data to identify children at risk of poor outcomes</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Jane Griffiths</surname><given-names initials="L">Lucy</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Raybould</surname><given-names initials="A">Alyce</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Dennison</surname><given-names initials="K">Karen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Harron</surname><given-names initials="K">Katie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bailey</surname><given-names initials="G">Grace</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom</institution></aff>
<aff id="affil-2"><label>2</label><institution>University College London, London, United Kingdom</institution></aff>
</contrib-group>
<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day></day><month></month><year></year></pub-date>
<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic"><year></year></pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>5</issue>
<elocation-id>3588</elocation-id>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/3588">This article is available from the IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/3588</self-uri>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Millions of children in the UK experience early adversity, with many requiring children’s social care (CSC) support. National longitudinal data on these children is essential to understand lifelong impacts on health and development, yet they are often excluded from the UK’s leading child development studies. This study explored the feasibility of using linked administrative records for sampling, supported by discussions with data owners.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We analysed populationlevel administrative data from the SAIL Databank (Wales) and the ECHILD database (England) to identify maternal psychosocial risk factors (such as mental health conditions, substance misuse and domestic violence) and CSC involvement before age six. A cohort was created of mothers with live births between April 2009 and March 2016, linked to secondary healthcare and CSC records. In parallel, we engaged with data providers across the UK to assess practical and governance considerations.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>In Wales, 15% of mothers whose child was involved in CSC had psychosocial risk factors. By contrast, only 4% of mothers without these risk factors had a child with CSC involvement. Further analyses are ongoing. Data providers confirmed that while administrative records have precedent for recruitment, ethical and sensitivity concerns pose barriers.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Findings highlight links between maternal vulnerability and CSC involvement, alongside rising psychosocial adversities. Administrative data offers valuable insights but using it to identify children at risk remains complex. Differences in legislation, governance, and data access across UK nations hinder a unified sampling frame, especially given the sensitivity of maternal and social care records.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</article>