<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" [
]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  dtd-version="1.2" article-type="abstract">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v10i3.3270</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10:3:236</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Evaluating the Benefits, Costs, and Utility of Synthetic Data for Data Owners
          and Trusted Research Environments</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Ogwayo</surname>
            <given-names initials="M">Melissa</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Madger</surname>
            <given-names initials="C">Cristina</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Zahid</surname>
            <given-names initials="H">Hina</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Haaker</surname>
            <given-names initials="M">Maureen</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom</institution></aff>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <elocation-id>3270</elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access"
          xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
            License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/3270">This article is available from the
        IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/3270</self-uri>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title>Objectives</title>
      <p>This study evaluates low-fidelity synthetic data's benefits, costs, and utility for data
        owners and Trusted Research Environments (TREs). It examines financial implications,
        operational efficiencies, and governance challenges, informing best practices for scalable
        and ethical synthetic data production. The findings will provide actionable insights for the
        entire research ecosystem.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>A mixed-methods approach evaluated synthetic data adoption among data owners and TREs. A
        literature review synthesized best practices, ethical considerations, and technical
        challenges. A survey assessed data owners' perceptions, readiness, and financial concerns.
        Using semi-structured interviews, policy analysis, and standard operating procedures (SOPs),
        case studies were conducted with existing synthetic data producers to examine frameworks,
        governance, and cost structures. Focus groups with TRE representatives explored operational
        challenges, security risks, and policy gaps. This research was a jointly funded initiative
        by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Data &amp; Infrastructure Programme and
        ADR UK, conducted by UK Data Service.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>When submitting this proposal, the study was ongoing and due to conclude in April 2025.
        Preliminary findings highlight that financial constraints currently hinder synthetic data
        production. Limited dedicated funding leads organisations to explore collaborations and
        process optimisation.</p>
      <p>Key challenges include data quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and the lack of
        dedicated training. Improved data access shows efficiency gains, but legal uncertainties
        slow adoption. Organisations vary in synthetic data sharing and licensing approaches,
        balancing openness with (perceived) risk management.</p>
      <p>Future efforts focus on sustainable funding, standardised governance, automation, and
        bridging expertise gaps. Addressing public misconceptions and defining set governance
        frameworks remain priorities. Organisations continue evaluating the feasibility of synthetic
        data with a view to expanding its role in research, policy, and innovation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Synthetic data offers significant potential for secure data sharing and privacy protection
        in an ever-evolving data landscape. However, governance inconsistencies, financial
        constraints, and public trust remain key barriers. Standardized policies, improved
        documentation, and cross-sector collaboration will ensure scalable, ethical, and impactful
        synthetic data adoption across research and industry.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>