<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" [
]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  dtd-version="1.2" article-type="abstract">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v10i3.3128</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10:3:108</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title> A co-produced framework for assessing common law basis of consent to enable
          record linkage for public good research </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Oakley</surname>
            <given-names initials="J">Jacqui</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>UK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration, Bristol,
        United Kingdom</institution></aff>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <elocation-id>3128</elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access"
          xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
            License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/3128">This article is available from the
        IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/3128</self-uri>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title>Objective</title>
      <p>UK-wide Longitudinal Population Studies (LPS) have been brought together and linked to NHS,
        socioeconomic records and environmental data within a Trusted Research Environment. To
        ensure compatibility with data processing, access and to enable public good research we
        needed to develop a way to assess the legal basis of LPS.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>With NHS England, we co-developed key criteria for assessing common law duty of
        confidentiality. A framework was developed for assessing information provided to
        participants. The framework focused on compatibility with our research purpose (for public
        good), data processing, and data access. Template documents were produced to capture
        communications and key statements providing evidence relating to the criteria. A risk-based
        approach was adopted and a Confidentiality Due Diligence Panel recruited and trained
        (comprising University Data Protection Officer, Governance leads, cross-disciplinary
        academic representation and members of the public recruited to the Panel).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>The framework was formalised and documented, guidance, risk-assessment approach and outputs
        agreed with NHS England. LPS completed templates providing evidence drawn from consent and
        communication materials. The risk assessment was applied and assessed by the Confidentiality
        Due Diligence Panel in 2024. Twenty-one LPS were reviewed against the criteria, 19 were
        considered to meet the common law basis of consent, 2 LPS are seeking alternative legal
        basis s251 to enable linkages. Other LPS are already supported by s251 legal basis. The
        Panel provided feedback help studies to develop clear communications advising on specific
        clarifications as required and precedents were noted to enable future assessments.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Co-development and implementation of a review framework for common law basis enabled robust
        and reproducible assessment of multiple LPS consent, information and communications
        materials. This allowed identification of LPS which have set reasonable expectations or
        advise on alternative legal permissions, and communications to enable record linkage in-line
        with participants wishes.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>