<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" [
]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  dtd-version="1.2" article-type="abstract">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2769</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">9:5:280</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Identifying a Birth Cohort of Twins from Linked Data – Challenges and Opportunities</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Campbell</surname>
            <given-names initials="A">Alexander Charles</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Young</surname>
            <given-names initials="J">Jesse T</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-4">4</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-5">5</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne</institution></aff>
      <aff id="affil-2"><label>2</label><institution>Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute</institution></aff>
      <aff id="affil-3"><label>3</label><institution>Justice Health Group, Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University</institution></aff>
      <aff id="affil-4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health</institution></aff>
      <aff id="affil-5"><label>5</label><institution>Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto</institution></aff>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <elocation-id>2769</elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/2769">This article is available from the IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/2769</self-uri>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title>Objective</title>
      <p>In the absence of accurate perinatal records, identifying and differentiating twins in administrative records is difficult because of their similarity; they share surnames, dates of birth, and residences. In administrative databases, events within twin pairs are often incorrectly identified as being from one individual, representing a threat to data accuracy. An inability to identify twins in administrative data precludes applying powerful twin-based causal inference methods to understand health and social well-being.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Approach</title>
      <p>We developed an algorithm using linked administrative birth, perinatal, emergency department, and hospital records in Victoria, Australia from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2023. We probabilistically linked a sample of 1,434 ‘known’ twin pairs from the Australian Twin Registry to validate the sensitivity of our algorithm. We calculated specificity using a sample of non-twins derived from linked data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>Our algorithm identified 37,900 twin pairs, 75,800 twin individuals, in the Victorian linked dataset. The accuracy of our ascertainment of twins by key characteristics will be presented and discussed.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The birth cohort we have generated is one of the largest twin cohorts in the world with unprecedented granularity in longitudinal health and social data.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Implications</title>
      <p>Our algorithm improves the accuracy of administrative data repositories and linkage, providing novel information on where errors in previous linkages have occurred due to limited familial or intergenerational information. Our large population-based birth cohort of twins can be used to investigate the familial and non-familial determinants of health using advanced causal inference which leverages the natural similarity between twins.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>