<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" [
]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  dtd-version="1.2" article-type="abstract">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2579</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">9:5:094</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Improving and re-developing the Clerical Resolution Online Widget (CROW): open-source software for clerical review</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>O'Dair</surname>
            <given-names initials="H">Hannah</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Cummins</surname>
            <given-names initials="S">Sarah</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Huck</surname>
            <given-names initials="R">Rachel</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>Office for National Statistics</institution></aff>
      <pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
        <day>18</day>
        <month>09</month>
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <elocation-id>2579</elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/2579">This article is available from the IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/2579</self-uri>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Due to the availability of data and the speed of delivery required, NHS number (Health ID) was used during the COVID-19 pandemic to join different health datasets to census 2021. This research sought to assess the quality of linkage done by NHS number, between COVID-19 vaccinations data and census 2021, by comparing to the quality that could be achieved with deterministic linkage using Personal Identifiable Information (PII). Specifically, we wanted to assure against concern that unlinked records may have been misclassified as unvaccinated due to inaccurate recording of NHS number at time of vaccination.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Approach</title>
      <p>We used deterministic (rules-based) linkage to identify extra links that were not made on NHS number. We also investigated how many links were incongruent between NHS number linkage and PII deterministic linkage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>We used deterministic (rules-based) linkage to identify extra links that were not made on NHS number. We also investigated how many links were incongruent between NHS number linkage and PII deterministic linkage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>We were able to assure that the NHS number linkage used to produce COVID-19 vaccinations statistics, was valid. Whilst 1,833,626 more links were made, the findings resulting from the linked data were unchanged.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Implications</title>
      <p>Whilst this research demonstrates the utility of NHS number-based linkage, acquisition and use of PII on health datasets can increase the link rate and plays a vital role in estimating linkage error.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>