<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd" [
]>
<article xml:lang="en" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
  xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"
  dtd-version="1.2" article-type="abstract">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJPDS</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Journal of Population Data Science</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title>IJPDS</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2399-4908</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Swansea University</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23889/ijpds.v10i3.3198</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">10:3:166</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Standardizing health data stewardship principles and practices in Canada</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>McGrail</surname>
            <given-names initials="K">Kim</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Kelly</surname>
            <given-names initials="M">Maureen</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="affil-2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="affil-1"><label>1</label><institution>University of British Columbia, Vancouver,
        Canada</institution></aff>
      <aff id="affil-2"><label>2</label><institution>Canadian Institute for Health Information,
        Ottawa, Canada</institution></aff>
      <pub-date>
        <day>01</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <elocation-id>3198</elocation-id>
      <permissions>
        <license license-type="open-access"
          xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/">
          <license-p>This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
            License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://ijpds.org/article/view/3198">This article is available from the
        IJPDS website at: https://ijpds.org/article/view/3198</self-uri>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec>
      <title>Objectives</title>
      <p>Canada is a constitutional federation, and responsibility for delivery of health and social
        services rests primarily with provinces and territories. This creates variation in
        legislation, regulation, policies and practice, including for governance and stewardship of
        health and social data. We describe collaborative efforts led by CIHI to reduce variations.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Method</title>
      <p>The starting points were recommendations from a pandemic-inspired expert advisory group on
        a pan-Canadian Health Data Strategy and an associated Pan-Canadian Health Data Charter. The
        Charter identifies 10 principles that “honour the duty to put people and populations at the
        core of all decisions about the disclosure, access and use of health information.” These
        resources were augmented with: a data stewardship framework crafted over eight months by a
        committee of all levels of government; a literature review; and interviews with key
        exemplars such as England’s National Data Guardian. The development process included
        engagement with many different interest holders.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>There is widespread recognition that standardizing approaches to data stewardship requires
        a shift in mindsets and collective culture. It will also require a redistribution of power,
        but it is less clear if that is widely accepted or understood. There is broad agreement on a
        definition of data stewardship and a set of principles for data sharing. Together, these
        highlight, among other things: the need to consider (and define) public benefit; the duty to
        share; the need for transparency; attention to privacy and safety for both individuals as
        well as groups and communities; and a commitment to safeguarding and nurturing data for now
        and for the future. There is also a commitment to uphold principles of Indigenous data
        sovereignty, as those are defined by Indigenous Peoples.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec>
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Data stewardship responsibilities rest with a large number of people across health care
        institutions, organizations and providers. A principles-based approach establishes broad and
        clear commitment to a common “north star”. The required transformation in data stewardship
        will take time and willingness to change, including more inclusive and shared
        decision-making.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
</article>